Frequently asked questions for academic and clinical researchers
What are the Trust’s priority areas for support?
- Research into the causes and treatments of disease, disability and frailty related to ageing which have the potential to have a meaningful impact on the health and well-being of older people within a reasonable time frame.
- Innovation in the care of older people, including rehabilitation and palliative care.
- Pilot studies in these areas which could establish whether larger investigations are justified.
We are also keen to see how the project is constructed to support the development of research capacity within the disciplines relevant to the above.
Is there anything that the Trust definitely will not fund?
- Sponsorship of individuals
- Sponsorship of conferences or events
- Organizations based outside the UK, or whose work primarily benefits people outside the UK
- Research via a third party (such as a fundraising charity supporting research for which the funds have not been raised/committed)
- Issues that are already well funded within the UK, such as heart disease or cancer
We will not meet:
- Institutional overheads (i.e. Full Economic Costs. We define contribution to the Apprenticeship Levy as an institutional overhead).
- Travel or conference fees (unless these are an integral part of a research project).
How are applications assessed?
Outline applications will be reviewed against our Grant-making Policy and Research Funding Strategy to assess whether they meet the our eligibility criteria and strategic priorities. Outline applications are eligibility checked, scored and ranked by the Trust’s experienced grants team using the following criteria:
- Demonstration of the project’s alignment with the trust’s strategic priorities
- Whether the project takes a suitably multi-disciplinary approach to problem-solving
- The suitability of the PPI statements
- Consideration of methodological risks and contingency plans
- Credibility and feasibility of the pathways to impact statement
- Credibility and feasibility of project team’s plans to support or increase research capacity in the Trust’s priority areas
Having a clear and accessible lay summary is particularly important at this stage. For help with this, try INVOLVE’s “Make it Clear” advice.
Those which do not meet the criteria for support and/or have a low probability of being funded based on the ranking will be rejected at this stage. Do please note that we receive many more applications than we can possibly fund so only the highest ranked eligible outline applications will be invited to prepare full applications. Owing to the volume of outline applications received, we are unable to give individual feedback at this stage, but we do publish a general report on our website which details common areas for improvement.
Outline applications that are successfully shortlisted will be invited to submit a full application.
All full applications for Research project grants will be subject to rigorous peer review and the scrutiny of the Research Grants Committee (which includes two suitably qualified Trustees and external advisers with extensive expertise relevant to the Trust’s priority areas). Grants will be awarded on the basis of scoring the following criteria and the submissions of the peer reviewers:
- academic quality;
- demonstration of need;
- value for money;
- feasibility of the research plan;
- competence of the applicant/the research team;
- suitability of the research environment;
- credibility and feasibility of the plan to achieve benefit beyond the academic community to improve the health and well-being of older people;
- credibility and feasibility of the project team’s plans to support the development of professional research careers in the Trust’s priority areas.
You should note that we receive many more applications than we can possibly fund and even if an application meets all of the criteria above, may still fall below the cut-off for funding.
All decisions of the Research Grants Committee are reported to the Board of Trustees. The Committee has delegated authority from the Board to make funding decisions within the agreed funding envelope. On occasion, a decision may be referred back to the Board if it is felt that the project risks compromising the reputation of the Trust.
What would you say a good application looks like?
- Your application will be looked at by several people: peer reviewers, other specialists, as well as non-specialists. Craft it so it can be understood by all these readers – the detail must be accurate, but make the main messages stand out for the non-specialist glancing through the application.
- Remember you know much more about your planned project than the reviewer. Don’t leave things in your head that need to be explained in the application – asking a critical friend to review the final draft can be useful.
- Be explicit about who will benefit, how, and why. Explain why the research is needed what impact will it have. The “pathways to impact” section is very important. (If you’d like help on how to write a good pathway statement, why not check out these resources?) Even if work is more “early stage”, there should be a clear pathway for what this work might lead to that ultimately improves the health and well-being of older people.
- Always provide an analytical plan (e.g., but not exclusively, a power calculation), based on solid evidence from the literature and/or feasibility data.
- Be realistic about what you can achieve with your resources, both in terms of the funding you request and the tasks you hope to achieve. Make sure that what you plan to do is feasible. In developing your application, focus on work that answers your core questions/objectives, which should be clearly specified and achievable in the time/resources available. Applications can fall down by having too broad a scope leading to concerns about feasibility.
- Be clear about how your proposed project fits with what is already known and how it will be a useful addition. Why does this particular project need to be done by this particular team at this particular time? Make clear what the gap in the literature is and how you intend to fill it (watch Dragons’ Den for examples…)
- For research that involves human participants (including samples extracted from human participants in the course of the study, or data originally collected from older people) make sure you have clear plans for public involvement, ideally that should include the development of your protocol e.g. reviewing your plain language summary.
- Write clearly and make sure your message comes across credibly. Tell a convincing story. Take a look at our strategic priorities and write in language that we will understand. You can find lots of help on writing a good lay summary via INVOLVE’s Make it Clear campaign.
- It’s not a time to be shy – shine! We want to be sure that you can deliver.
- And last but not least, allow yourself plenty of time, everything takes longer than you think. Remember that you’ll need input from your finance colleagues and from your head of department or Dean. They will all need to create accounts on the Grants Management Portal and “sign off” on your application before you can submit. Check the deadlines and work back from there.
Where can I see examples of what sort of work the Trust funds?
When can I apply and what is involved?
We use an online application system (Grants Management Portal) and you will need to register for an account. We are also an ORCID member organisation. In common with a number of other major funders, we now require all applicants for research grants to provide an ORCID iD when completing an application form in our Grants Management Portal. Applicants who don’t have an ORCID iD can register for one and complete the education, employment, funding and publications (“works”) sections of their ORCID profile. This will auto-populate the relevant sections of our application form.
The application process is in two stages: an outline application followed by a full application for those successfully shortlisted at outline stage. Peer review will be conducted for those applications invited to submit full applications, which will then be reviewed and scored by our Research Grants Committee.
The online application forms will only appear within the Portal when the scheme is open to applications so do check current deadlines for opening and closing dates. Here’s a copy of the outline application form to help you to start planning your application – but do please note that we will only accept submissions via the Grants Management Portal during the published application periods.
Is there a standard application form?
We have a two-stage online application process. You will need to register for an account on our Grants Management Portal and then select the scheme for which you are applying. The online application form will only appear within the Portal when the scheme is open to applications so do check current deadlines for opening and closing dates. You can download a copy of the outline application forms below to help you start planning your application – but do please note that we will only accept submissions via the Grants Management Portal during the published application periods.
Where can I find help on registering for and using Dunhill's online Grants Management Portal?
What costs will you cover?
Please note that costs can only increase by up to 10% from outline to full and therefore the costs you apply for at outline need to be as accurate as possible.
Our guidelines reflect the established convention that research grants paid by charities generally cover the costs directly incurred in undertaking a project (termed Directly Incurred Costs by the Research Councils), which in most cases are a major proportion of the total cost of the work to be done. We will not meet ‘overhead’ costs, including the cost of the time of PIs and CoIs and most of those other costs which Research Councils term Directly Allocated Costs, Estates Costs and Indirect Costs (i.e. Full Economic Costs or fECs). Universities receive funding through the Charities element of the Quality-Related (“QR”) Funding distributed by the Higher Education Funding Council as a contribution towards these costs. A grant awarded by the DUnhill Medical Trust will qualify for support in this way. Proposals for funding should detail carefully all of the relevant directly incurred costs, with reference to the following guidance.
Eligible staff costs
- We will meet directly incurred salary costs, such as salaries of research assistants, whose time can be supported by a full audit trail. The level of salary requested should be fully justified in the case for support. Salary costs should include any increments to which an individual is entitled. Any anticipated future pay awards should not exceed 1.5% p.a. and should be fully justified.
- We will not meet any portion of the directly allocated salary costs of PIs
- We will not meet any portion of the directly allocated salary costs of CoIs, except where:
- They are spending 50% or more of their time directly working on the research project
- They are staff who are clearly providing institution-wide services and are organised in an appropriate manner (for example, the provision of statistical advice from a statistical services department by staff who are dependent on generating income to cover their salaries).
- We will not meet any portion of the salary costs of any other academic (lecturer or equivalent), clinical or allied health professional (of equivalent status) or other equivalent employees, unless there is a clear and direct research-related contribution to the project (see first bullet point).
- We will not contribute towards the Apprenticeship levy.
- Clinical Trial Unit (CTU) Staff: we may provide a reasonable contribution towards CTU staff participating in the research, providing appropriate justification is given. Please see the section below for more details.
It is expected that Research Assistants and other staff directly employed on a project:
- Will normally be employees of the organisation hosting the project (i.e. the organisation employing the PI and/or CoIs).
- May be employed by other eligible organisations, where their involvement is necessary to fulfil a well-defined purpose, such as provision of specialist analytical services.
- Exceptionally, these staff may work for other organisations, or as independent specialists, where their involvement is necessary to fulfil a well-defined purpose (such as specialist consultancy advice).
Research project grants are intended for postdoctoral level research. We will however consider projects where a PhD student is working within a larger team with postdoctoral researchers (this would not include a project where the Principal Investigator is supervising one PhD student). In such circumstances you may request a stipend for the time they will spend on the project but we will not cover the other costs of the studentship. We have other schemes for PhD level study.
Eligible non-staff costs
- We will meet approved directly incurred non-staff costs in full (i.e. costs directly attributable to the project), including:
- travel and subsistence costs
- small pieces of equipment costing up to £10,000
- materials and consumables
- We will meet justified payments for public involvement at INVOLVE rates
- We may meet some directly allocated costs with appropriate justification (e.g. the costs of using research facilities such as imaging scanners, infrastructure technician costs etc.)
- We will not meet overhead costs, typically those identified by Research Councils as Directly Allocated Costs, Indirect Costs and Estates Costs.
Guidance on specific non-staff cost items:
- Travel and subsistence costs for PIs, CoIs and staff assigned to the project where these are required by the nature of the work. These will normally be met and should be based on the most suitable and economical form of travel.
- Conference costs: The costs of attendance at conferences by members of the research team to disseminate the findings from the grant may be applied for. All requests will require detailed justification. The costs for attending a conference as a delegate will not be met.
- Requests for project-specific items of equipment costing up to £10k may be met but should be fully justified. For requests between £10k and £100k, we will expect a detailed case to be provided and at least a 50% contribution towards the total cost of the equipment from the host institution and/or other funders. Suppliers’ quotations will also be required.
- We would normally expect the host institution to provide access to major equipment, but where specific circumstances require substantial usage and either the purchase of a major item of equipment specifically for the project, or a contribution to the use of major equipment is requested, a detailed case should be provided, with the University contributing at least 50% of the costs.
- The cost of materials and consumables required to carry out the proposed research will be met but should be justified with special regard to those categories of overhead costs which DMT will not meet. Estimated figures for consumables/materials are not acceptable and must be itemised.
- Non-UK costs (for e.g. specialist tests or assays) may be met, on condition that full justification is provided. It will however be the responsibility of the host institution to reimburse the non-UK institution for carrying out such tests.
- Computers and other IT equipment dedicated to the project may be met, on condition that full justification is provided.
- Data storage and archiving: we will contribute 50% towards these costs, up to a maximum of £500 per grant.
- Recruitment costs: we will pay a maximum of £500 towards recruitment costs for staff being supported by the grant.
- Publication costs: may be included in applications but should be fully justified and comply with DMTs open access policy.
Can I request a contribution towards NHS resources?
Applications that include NHS resources will need to adhere to the Department of Health AcoRD guidance. As an AMRC member charity, Trust would expect any research costs identified as ‘Part B’ (e.g. recruitment of participants or data collection) that are carried out by existing staff employed by the NHS, NIHR Clinical Research Network (NIHR CRN) or other clinical organisation to be paid by the Department of Health through local networks or the NHS Trust (Guidance FAQ 6 and 7). Any Part B costs included in an application will be automatically struck out and applicants should therefore pay particular attention to attributing costs appropriately (consulting their local CRN prior to submitting an application where necessary).
Excess Treatment Costs
Studies taking place in England
From 1 October 2018 the way in which Excess treatment Costs (RTCs) are assessed and paid is changing. The process will now be managed by the NIHR Local Clinical Research Networks (LCRNs) on behalf of their region’s Clinical Commissioning Groups (CCGs). In order to assess applications that include ETCs the Health Regulatory Authority (HRA) have mandated that researchers will be required to complete a new form known as a ‘Schedule of Events Cost Attribution Template (SoECAT)’ for clinical research. This schedule will form part of the IRAS application process and it will not be possible for researchers to apply for ethical approval for studies that include ETCs if it has not been completed.
Researchers who study includes ETCs and who have been invited to submit a full DMT application will need to complete a SoECAT and submit it to the AcoRD Specialist for your region. Once the specialist has authorised your costs, the authorised version must be uploaded to your DMT application using the file upload function.
To help researchers the NIHR have produced a dedicated web page, where researchers can download guidance and the SoECAT. Researchers should also consult the NIHR AcoRD web page for guidance on attributing costs and this page also contains a link to the regional AcoRD specialists
Although the SoECAT is only applicable to full applications, applicants submitting an outline application to DMT which includes ETCs are urged to look at the advice provided by NIHR and to contact their regions AcoRD Specialist to determine the likely turnaround time for their SoECAT, so that they are aware of the timescales involved if invited to submit a full application.
If a researcher is concerned that their SoECAT will not be authorised in time for DMTs submission deadline, they are strongly advised to contact the Trust immediate.
Studies taking place in Northern Ireland, Scotland or Wales
There is no change in the way in which Excess Treatment Costs (ETCs) are assessed and paid. However, applicants are advised, if they have not already done so, to discus their project with the relevant body (see below). Where possible, confirmation that the ETCs have been reviewed and considered acceptable, should be uploaded as a supporting document.
Northern Ireland – https://research.hscni.net/
Scotland – http://www.nhsresearchscotland.org.uk/
Can I submit more than one application at a time?
What is an ORCID iD and why do I have to have one?
Through ORCID, researchers can allow funders, publishers and research organisations to access the information in their ORCID profile during grant and manuscript submission. In the future, we’ll be able to automatically capture research-related information linked to individuals, to simplify and speed up grant application and reporting processes.
How are the Trust's external peer reviewers chosen?
When will I hear if my application has been successful?
At full application stage the Research Grants Committee will make its recommendations to the next available meeting of the Board of Trustees. These meetings are held in March, June and December. The outcome will normally be notified to applicants within two weeks of the relevant meeting of the Board of Trustees.
What are the Trust's requirements for being a Principal Investigator?
Principal Investigators (Lead Applicants) should be:
- Academics (normally at senior lecturer level or above or equivalent); or
- Clinicians (normally at consultant level or equivalent); or
- Allied health professionals (normally at post-doctoral level or with equivalent research experience), or
- other appropriately qualified professionals with a strong involvement in the health of older people (normally at senior scientist level, or equivalent) who are employees of an eligible research organisation holding:
- a permanent post, or
- a fixed term post which extends beyond the duration of the grant.
Lead applicants for whom this is a first grant as Principal Investigator will not be precluded, indeed, the Trust wishes to encourage the development of research capacity by providing opportunities for career development. We would, however, expect to see a more experienced researcher as a Co-Investigator with a clear plan for mentoring and support.
What are the Trust's requirements for being a Co-Investigator?
Academic Co-Investigators – CoI – (Co-Applicants) should meet:
- The same criteria as for PIs (as above), except for those in fixed term posts. For this category of CoI, the requirement should be that their post should extend at least for the duration of the grant.
- Research Assistants may be named as CoIs if they have made a significant contribution to the proposal, and they will be employed for a significant proportion of their time on the project (normally at least 50%).
- CoIs are expected to make a substantial and defined contribution to the research. You will be required to state the contribution of the CoI to the project in the application form.
Lay co-applicants should have appropriate and directly relevant expertise and should be spending a substantive amount of time on the project and not merely fulfilling an advisory role.
Do you accept applications for research involving the use of animals?
Do you accept applications for research involving research conducted in a Clinical Trials Unit?
Will the Trust act as a research sponsor?
I see that the Trust is an NIHR commercial partner. What does this mean for my project?
Established by the Department of Health, the NIHR:
- funds high quality research to improve health
- trains and supports health researchers
- provides world-class research facilities
- works with the life sciences industry and charities to benefit all
- involves patients and the public at every step.
The NIHR Study Support Service
Regardless of the size of your study, where it’s based (as long as it is in England) and the specialty, you can access the same set of NIHR support services. There are six services to make the most of:
- Early contact and engagement – To make the greatest impact on study delivery, engage with the NIHR CRN from the outset and gain access to free support that provides benefits throughout the full life-cycle of your study.
- Early contact and engagement – To make the greatest impact on study delivery, engage with the NIHR CRN from the outset and gain access to free support that provides benefits throughout the full life-cycle of your study.
- Early Feedback – Access NHS clinical experts across all therapeutic specialties to advise on the feasibility and deliverability of your study in the NHS.
- Site Identification – Liaise with your Local Clinical Research Network to help identify sites for your study from over 240+ NHS organisations and 10,000+ General Practices in England.
- Optimising delivery – The NIHR CRN assessment informs and enables the type of support your study will need
- Effective study set-up – Benefit from a national study-wide action plan for streamlined study set-up across all NHS sites supporting your study.
- Performance monitoring - Proactive study-wide performance monitoring helps your study to meet its recruitment targets within planned timescales.
To find out more about this support and how it can benefit you, check out the animation at the link or contact the NIHR on:
t: 0113 343 4555
Will I need to obtain ethical approval or a Home Office Licence before I can apply?
Does the Trust have an Open Access Policy?
Does the Trust provide funding to cover Open Access fees?
In line with its Open Access Policy, the Trust will provide a contribution towards the valid costs of open access fees levied by publishers who support the open access model, but demand payment to allow manuscripts to be made available on Europe PMC within 6 months of the official date of publication.
When publishing papers arising from our funded grants, grant holders must also ensure that the Trust is correctly acknowledged.
Does the Trust have a policy on Intellectual Property Rights?
What is Researchfish?
Does the Trust have links to the tobacco industry?
Grants for academic or clinical researchers
View and download the supporting policy documents
The Dunhill Medical Trust
6 New Bridge Street
London EC4V 6AB